From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 07:36:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB6A106566B; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:36:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giovanni.trematerra@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04EDD8FC19; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:36:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyc1 with SMTP id 1so6901715qyc.13 for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:36:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=nUambMtWcRXruDRShL0lhwk8QjSac7UuSeaeuMOonZ0=; b=UpR02pTrgHC5hUTzgbhwaDNYvqwZ9vj7yGvKbqAiBGdrYhB0A7XQfxot1Ab8OqhBWc 37/z3tdA563U9nfO1V0yH4BSJwCH14CSFB9KRwMrd8ERpYzq9CSRr6xzeFIj1G19m2jy tHhtsZUlILjhCOmEeZ4xMkA4Tjqp1z8K35YeY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.69.195 with SMTP id a3mr828956qcj.179.1320910584401; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:36:24 -0800 (PST) Sender: giovanni.trematerra@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.1.216 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 23:36:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5CCE304D-FF92-45F1-8D1F-7B9EA224E417@bsdimp.com> References: <20111110031828.GC6110@elvis.mu.org> <5CCE304D-FF92-45F1-8D1F-7B9EA224E417@bsdimp.com> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:36:24 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NzpFhPBAO3yRzcX_sEb0HMWa3CI Message-ID: From: Giovanni Trematerra To: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Garrett Cooper , Alfred Perlstein , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: deprecated TIOCSPGRP and TIOCGPGRP ioctl command X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:36:26 -0000 On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > I tend to agree: aren't there more pressing problems in the project that will solve actual problems rather than create a lot of work to save a tiny number of bytes in the object code. > Of course, I'm mergeing fifo and pipe implementations. fifoes don't implement them while pipes do. So I was wondering if they were still used nowadays just to be clear to me if I have to preserve them or not. BTW happy birthday! :) -- Gianni