From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 4 07:51:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7A8106564A for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 07:51:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from natbsd@instinctive.eu) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F9A8FC1C for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 07:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eeke49 with SMTP id e49so3032097eek.13 for ; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:51:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent:x-gm-message-state; bh=PnlwijuMJXao6CmiSijjzKBb/DaHuH6yXtvyyVsBALE=; b=jTiWpdfSKHEWtuX6oaQxXF7USC145LCY/qLb5oHFut4V3hTIc13aYUM0x+Q4rfB6jy JoMnGLX2voxkMG8slcaKdJyrFLW7bn6dVFLkv60q3/lLg1miCCn37PV9IwZwfFHv4GZW f+eLUt5oWUQz4vcNNA5tb2aCphxFfaMWk1SmKZm8IGD95f4ZEPmc3HzfEL0w7qjISsYt NfOvvXTvZQxiE0lINl18v6Yf/RMBX6sagjUQmHOhXMDd2a1/xwD43p2PR5c9586lhVnM E5QBVQZrGaIm0rbGIQDwxTKW1Ca76pnduoyQ0tnBEnluk7Ja5085YWOYm4GwoVS1ILJT qAQQ== Received: by 10.14.127.8 with SMTP id c8mr5129535eei.148.1341388271060; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:51:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sigil.instinctive.eu ([2001:758:f00:340:78:41:233:119]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y54sm51437900eef.10.2012.07.04.00.51.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:51:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:51:03 +0200 From: Natacha =?iso-8859-1?Q?Port=E9?= To: matt Message-ID: <20120704075103.GC31763@sigil.instinctive.eu> References: <20120523151357.GC97037@sigil.instinctive.eu> <201207031820.22657.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> <20120703231540.I46641@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <201207032128.24837.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> <4FF3512E.10908@mehnert.org> <4FF3D39A.3030800@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4FF3D39A.3030800@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn4Xa1mEn1SAXQeb9GKV3KLoJ+IaWoAYq0Oc6EknLfsqUnc7jxV3dlP9kA4HKheSB0v4tVy Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, Ian Smith Subject: Re: How can I help with thinkpad x220 issues? X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 07:51:12 -0000 on Tuesday 03 July 2012 at 22:24, matt wrote: > On 07/03/12 13:08, Hannes Mehnert wrote: > > I believe you've to patch acpi_ibm with the lenovo (LEN0068) identifier > > and recompile - see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/164538 > > > Indeed, however I wouldn't hope for too much. The new EC seems to have > some differences. > While some values appear and work, I'm not sure it will help much. Other > values have appeared corrupted for me, while thankfully not appearing to > crash the ec or cause malfunction. As I wrote elsewhere, I haven't benefited from LEN0068-patched acpi_ibm except for wifi/bluetooth/thinklight switch through sysctl and the few other little things. Is it suppose to do more than that? > LEN0068 is a slightly different beast, it would appear. That leads back to the original question still in the subject: is there anything I can do to help support of LEN0068? Is it different enough to warrant a fork from acpi_ibm? Are there specifications supposed to be available somewhere? Thanks for your help, Natacha Porté