From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 22:01:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C76E106566C; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:01:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward16.mail.yandex.net (forward16.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1402::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E0E8FC13; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp19.mail.yandex.net (smtp19.mail.yandex.net [95.108.252.19]) by forward16.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id ADE12D22346; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 02:00:31 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1326578431; bh=Gi6VkwuNAqDZq4KrhJpcqKpbFU3ot1mU2EtN2LL54tQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=n0tGtT961O3iZbLd34zs6cewqQqCxDvFJJ8ZrokUcUpv+MB5N7iUljIe2bN7W84Sd gfeXiMg/fe1fN3xBbryo8sUfK+VSbCVK/7pxaTBJtsvDMWqWklV2lohaDZl/kaN114 w2sxVuhXDnjkq/NYLfJWQwmJtQ0MWc+NJx/WDzxU= Received: from smtp19.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp19.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 51D04BE011F; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 02:00:31 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1326578431; bh=Gi6VkwuNAqDZq4KrhJpcqKpbFU3ot1mU2EtN2LL54tQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=n0tGtT961O3iZbLd34zs6cewqQqCxDvFJJ8ZrokUcUpv+MB5N7iUljIe2bN7W84Sd gfeXiMg/fe1fN3xBbryo8sUfK+VSbCVK/7pxaTBJtsvDMWqWklV2lohaDZl/kaN114 w2sxVuhXDnjkq/NYLfJWQwmJtQ0MWc+NJx/WDzxU= Received: from unknown (unknown [77.93.52.19]) by smtp19.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id 0R5GB9Pj-0U5esKSS; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 02:00:31 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 00:00:25 +0200 From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: =?windows-1251?B?188gyu7t/Oru4iwgRnJlZUxpbmU=?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <68477246.20120115000025@yandex.ru> To: bz@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <201201142126.q0ELQVbZ087496@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201201142126.q0ELQVbZ087496@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, rwatson@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/164130: broken netisr initialization X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:01:03 -0000 also in r222249 next things are broken: 1. in net.isr.dispatch = deferred intr{swiX: netisr X} always have state 'WAIT' PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 11 root 155 ki31 0K 32K RUN 1 25:02 87.16% idle{idle: cpu1} 11 root 155 ki31 0K 32K CPU0 0 25:08 86.72% idle{idle: cpu0} 11 root 155 ki31 0K 32K CPU2 2 24:23 83.50% idle{idle: cpu2} 11 root 155 ki31 0K 32K CPU3 3 24:47 81.93% idle{idle: cpu3} 12 root -92 - 0K 248K WAIT 3 0:59 6.54% intr{irq266: re0} 3375 root 40 0 15468K 6504K select 2 1:03 4.98% snmpd 12 root -72 - 0K 248K WAIT 3 0:28 3.12% intr{swi1: netisr 1} 12 root -60 - 0K 248K WAIT 0 0:34 1.71% intr{swi4: clock} 12 root -72 - 0K 248K WAIT 3 0:27 1.71% intr{swi1: netisr 3} 12 root -72 - 0K 248K WAIT 1 0:20 1.37% intr{swi1: netisr 0} 0 root -92 0 0K 152K - 2 0:30 0.98% kernel{dummynet} 12 root -72 - 0K 248K WAIT 3 0:13 0.88% intr{swi1: netisr 2} 13 root -92 - 0K 32K sleep 1 0:11 0.24% ng_queue{ng_queue3} 13 root -92 - 0K 32K sleep 1 0:11 0.10% ng_queue{ng_queue0} 13 root -92 - 0K 32K sleep 1 0:11 0.10% ng_queue{ng_queue1} 2. There is no cpu load differences between dispatch methods. I have tested two: direct and deferred (see on picture) http://piccy.info/view3/2482121/cc6464fbe959fd65ecb5a8b94a23ec38/orig/ 'deferred' method works same as 'direct' method!