From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 12 14:28:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FFD1065675 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:28:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607858FC1C for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:28:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyb11 with SMTP id 11so6045110iyb.13 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:28:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eWKp4vR7MR/JIUpIcDnnrIxaW9uvBFmncjK97RHFISA=; b=KxGLItsx+Uig0XBS7L5wpp8gdfPpOacByDwGyEiyAbvaU0JMPFdImAWaCSwYNLOtXC jVoJiYiVpo0KenabbhSsFO2F1O3xqcTr3ryXWx8ZKfw8pspb1tlGEzlaHPY9N6EDC5AX R1hsC95zz1B7zYbLx/6sp9SipB92vIv9lUl9U= Received: by 10.231.112.193 with SMTP id x1mr5631824ibp.59.1310479594084; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:06:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.190.141 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:06:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110628010822.GA41399@icarus.home.lan> References: <1309217450.43651.YahooMailRC@web120014.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20110628010822.GA41399@icarus.home.lan> From: Chris Rees Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:06:04 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qQzwDKKlqa8YlpEdvw0xtsVP2HI Message-ID: To: Jeremy Chadwick Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, George Sanders Subject: Re: Improving old-fashioned UFS2 performance with lots of inodes... X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:28:18 -0000 On 28 June 2011 02:08, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > On what exact OS version? =A0Please don't say "8.2", need to know > 8.2-RELEASE, -STABLE, or what. =A0You said "8.x" above, which is too > vague. =A0If 8.2-STABLE you should not be tuning vm.kmem_size_max at all, > and you probably don't need to tune vm.kmem_size either. We don't do 8.2-STABLE, it's 8-STABLE.... Are you referring to the difference between RELENG_8_2 and RELENG_8_2_0_RELEASE? Chris