From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 27 10:25:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1104C16A4CE; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 10:25:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hafnium.btinternet.com (hafnium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD3C43D39; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 10:25:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from matt_mills@btopenworld.com) Received: from host213-122-21-155.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([213.122.21.155] helo=btopenworld.com) by hafnium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #25) id 1BIWHA-0002HX-00; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:21:44 +0100 Message-ID: <408E96E5.3070909@btopenworld.com> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:22:45 +0100 From: Matt Mills User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Andree References: <408D82A4.1040609@btopenworld.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: joe-devel-2.9.8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 17:25:32 -0000 Matthias Andree wrote: > Matt Mills writes: > > >>Just an FYI - JOE v3.0 was released on April 22nd. > > > AFAICS, the ports tree is frozen (see > ), so the > update cannot be committed right now -- unless it fixes serious joe bugs > and gets portmgr@ approval. > > If you know _COMPELLING_ reasons to update to 3.0, bring them forth. > > If it's just in the "nice to have" department, then the update will > happen after the ports tree unfreeze. A couple of days only probably. > Sorry, I had no idea the ports tree was frozen for an upcoming release. It makes sense, I just never thought about it. The only reason I was in such a hurry to see the joe-devel port updated was because I read that it now has syntax highlighting, which exicted me :) Thanks for the response, and sorry once more for time wasting. -- Matt