From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jan 22 04:52:01 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA08526 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 22 Jan 1996 04:52:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA08510 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 1996 04:51:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id EAA02424; Mon, 22 Jan 1996 04:44:50 -0800 Message-Id: <199601221244.EAA02424@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95 To: Luigi Rizzo cc: mpp@mpp.minn.net (Mike Pritchard), davidg@Root.COM, imp@village.org, hackers@freebsd.org, dworkin@rover.village.org Subject: Re: Security (was: Re: Two commands: icat and ils) In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 22 Jan 1996 13:16:15 +0100." <199601221216.NAA05095@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 22 Jan 1996 04:44:49 -0800 From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >>> Luigi Rizzo said: > so it seems that there is really no point in keeping the current > protection modes. Well, I just tried over here just for the heck of it.. rah# /sbin/init init: already running I seem to remember that you can never run init after the system was running in multi user mode . Unless it was broken and someone fixed it later on. Amancio