From owner-freebsd-current Fri Nov 10 09:59:46 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id JAA04615 for current-outgoing; Fri, 10 Nov 1995 09:59:46 -0800 Received: from asstdc.scgt.oz.au (root@asstdc.scgt.oz.au [202.14.234.65]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA04610 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 1995 09:59:42 -0800 Received: (from imb@localhost) by asstdc.scgt.oz.au (8.6.12/BSD-4.4) id EAA11398 for current@freebsd.org; Sat, 11 Nov 1995 04:59:35 +1100 From: michael butler Message-Id: <199511101759.EAA11398@asstdc.scgt.oz.au> Subject: IPv6 ? To: current@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 04:59:32 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24beta] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 355 Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Now that there is a growing framework of documentation describing IPv6, I'm tempted to ask .. has anyone yet addressed the issue of merging in IPv6 capability (RFC1752 .. I think that's what I just read) or reviewed what facilities might be required to enable the transitionary encapsulations in FreeBSD ? 128 bit addresses sound like fun :-) michael