From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 14 13:21:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A981516A4CE for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:21:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBF843D2D for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:21:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so386658rng for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 06:21:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=liY2MnyYphwTtVzvG3v2/mhnkDRSI3/68EsMzhveoWQSZQC2nqpd+Rwy3EcKqlcFlhmN47mj+b7owdEbu+iIQ1LMogLh0V6n9ouimTHgdZD35aPOdtcYiLLowxe4z5sF2tDLPhpKd2gpe4T9cOg6DEGtAJCpKh9/GwdcoWrzbEY= Received: by 10.38.160.51 with SMTP id i51mr1025742rne; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 06:21:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?127.0.0.1? ([59.93.192.135]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id r34sm976720rna.2005.04.14.06.21.06; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 06:21:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <425E6E35.6050600@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 18:50:53 +0530 From: Subhro User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050414071958.23388.qmail@web54004.mail.yahoo.com> <425E32A2.1080809@gmail.com> <938568187.20050414143549@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <938568187.20050414143549@wanadoo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: India had no FreeBSD mirror sites ?!? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:21:09 -0000 Anthony Atkielski wrote: >All the more reason to have a mirror in India. The shorter the distance >to cover, the faster the transfer is likely to be, > This is definitely technically true but not practially as far as India is concern. The average bandwidth available to individual is 56Kbps (actual, not the rated). A few lucky souls DO have access to high speed links in the range of ~1Mbps but that is truly not the mass. So as far as transfer rate is concerned, the bottleneck is definitely not the physical location of the source. > and the lower the >cost. > This also is not applicable is here. Having spent quite some time in US, I am well aware of the fact that for many ISPs, data tranferred within the local uplink is free. However this is not the case here. Firstly as most users access internet on dialup, they do not have any data restrictions. The people who *do* have a fat downlink would pay equally for data transferred from an Indian server or from an American Server. >Additionally, a mirror site in India could burn CDs locally and hand >them out, subject to licensing restrictions. > > This is really a wonderful idea. It never struck to me. Even without going in for a online mirror, I can take initiative and execute this. Thanks Anthony. I would also request the concerned person to kindly let me know how I can get listed on the FreeBSD Handbook. Best Regards, S.