From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 21 11:08:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E9616A421 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:08:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D0143DAC for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:07:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8586B60DB; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:07:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08292-01; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:07:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [216.201.118.138] (racerx.makeworld.com [216.201.118.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9B560DA; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:07:40 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <42DF81FE.7030804@makeworld.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:07:42 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (X11/20050715) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Colin A. Aldred" References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 OpenPGP: id=C01BC363 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.2 (20050629) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ISOs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:08:06 -0000 Colin A. Aldred wrote: > Please can you tell me why there are two 'ISO' disc images for FreeBSD? > > Namely: > > 5.4-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso > 5.4-RELEASE-i386-disc2.iso > > Disc1 is larger than a standard CD so requires a DVD...so why bother > splitting them into disc1 and 2 when both would easily fit on one handy > DVD??? With as many times as this has been asked, it's been answered just as often what the 2 (or in some cases, 3 and 4) ISO's are for. This could be one of 3 things: 1. A troll. 2. Someone bragging that they have a DVD player/writer. 3. Someone that is just too lazy to search the Questions list. -- Best regards, Chris Information travels more surely to those with a lesser need to know.