From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Wed Nov 11 14:16:39 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B722EB33D for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 14:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CWRcR0Fy8z4qTm for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 14:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 08B8A2EB433; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 14:16:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 087F32EB1C6 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 14:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CWRcQ6PF4z4qPQ for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 14:16:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE8C815B50 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 14:16:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0ABEGcY1011568 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 14:16:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 0ABEGcQ9011567 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 14:16:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250740] mail/mailsync 12.2-RELEASE breaks package build Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 14:16:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: fernape@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 14:16:39 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250740 Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fernape@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa --- Created attachment 219554 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D219554&action= =3Dedit Patch to the ports tree Hi Colin, Thanks for the report. I see mail/mailsync does not build in 11.4 or 12.2 b= ut it does build in 12.1 and 13-current. Would you mind trying this patch? It basically builds with GCC in those cas= es. I will investigate a bit more. The culprit seems to be this in mail/cclient: configure:5854: checking if adding -fno-operator-names helps configure:5864: c++ -c -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-alias= ing=20 -fno-operator-names -I/usr/local/include/c-client conftest.cpp >&5 In file included from conftest.cpp:32: In file included from /usr/local/include/c-client/c-client.h:42: In file included from /usr/local/include/c-client/osdep.h:29: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/stdlib.h:100: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/math.h:311: /usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:1364:1: error: unknown type name 'cclientPrivate' private: ^ /usr/local/include/c-client/c-client.h:35:17: note: expanded from macro 'private' #define private cclientPrivate /* private to c-client */ ^ In file included from conftest.cpp:32: In file included from /usr/local/include/c-client/c-client.h:42: In file included from /usr/local/include/c-client/osdep.h:29: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/stdlib.h:100: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/math.h:311: /usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:1365:5: error: expected expression typedef _LIBCPP_NODEBUG_TYPE typename remove_reference<_Tp>::type _Up; ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:1367:51: error: use of undeclared identifier '_Up' typedef _LIBCPP_NODEBUG_TYPE typename __decay<_Up, __is_referenceable<_Up>::value>::type type; ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:1367:81: error: non-friend class member 'va= lue' cannot have a qualified name typedef _LIBCPP_NODEBUG_TYPE typename __decay<_Up, __is_referenceable<_Up>::value>::type type; =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20 ~~^ /usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:1367:81: error: typedef declarator cannot be qualified typedef _LIBCPP_NODEBUG_TYPE typename __decay<_Up, __is_referenceable<_Up>::value>::type type; =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20 ~~^ /usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:1367:86: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list typedef _LIBCPP_NODEBUG_TYPE typename __decay<_Up, __is_referenceable<_Up>::value>::type type; =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20 ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:1721:1: error: unknown type name 'cclientPrivate' private: ^ With the patch, it builds in {11.4,12.1}{amd64,i386} 12.2amd64 and 13-curre= nt amd64. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=