From owner-freebsd-current Fri Oct 4 13:16:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1281937B401 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 13:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F22F43E65 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 13:16:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g94KGNpS075555; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 22:16:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Daniel Holmes Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 04 Oct 2002 14:11:12 MDT." <200210042011.g94KBCcq036473@zorkmid.dakcs.com> Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 22:16:23 +0200 Message-ID: <75554.1033762583@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200210042011.g94KBCcq036473@zorkmid.dakcs.com>, Daniel Holmes write s: >As I understand vinum & ccd (please correct me if I am wrong), this will >keep ccd from ever achieving the performance and ease of use of vinum. I don't think anybody advocated ccd as a wholesale replacement for vinum. That being said, I have lost more data on vinum RAID5 volumes than on striped ccd parititions, and not becaue of hardware failures. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message