From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 15 5:16: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from imo-d06.mx.aol.com (imo-d06.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F45A37B423 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 05:16:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from raviprasad20@netscape.net) Received: from raviprasad20@netscape.net by imo-d06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v30.10.) id n.58.34d596 (16221) for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 08:15:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from netscape.com (aimmail01.aim.aol.com [205.188.144.193]) by air-in01.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.37) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 May 2001 08:15:56 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 08:15:56 -0400 From: raviprasad20@netscape.net To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Memory organization in case of large amount of data (jumbo grams) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <3C3AC794.368D5BEE.9513E96F@netscape.net> X-Mailer: Franklin Webmailer 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, My doubt is whether freebsd uses the normal mbuf & clusters in case of large amount of data (like jumbogram in ipv6 or the maximum ipv4 datagram size of 65536 bytes)? My understanding is that for such a large amount of data, clusters which can hold only 2048 byes are not economical. Hence freebsd might be using some other type of buffers which have large capacity. Kindly mail me regarding this. Is my understanding correct. Kindly make me updated on buffers used in such cases. regards ravi prasad __________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Webmail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message