Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:32:37 -0500 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>, freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trivial PR, fix shutdown of rc services started with onestart (fwd) Message-ID: <20100414203237.GA5468@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1004141308080.15709@qbhto.arg> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1004141308080.15709@qbhto.arg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 01:18:00PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > This issue has come up several times in the past, and previously I've bee= n=20 > opposed to making changes since I don't regard typing "onestop" an=20 > overwhelming burden. :) However there is a reasonable argument to be mad= e=20 > for having things work when the system is shut down. >=20 > I'm not sure the patch in the PR is right (mostly for lack of examination= =20 > or testing), but I'm wondering what people think about the general idea o= f=20 > having the shutdown action ignore whether _enable is on? I think it's basically acceptable. I get bit by this too often and I can't think of a scenario where it would do the wrong thing without some pretty serious gyrations on the administrator's part. -- Brooks >=20 > Doug >=20 > --=20 >=20 > Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with > a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ >=20 > Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. > -- Pablo Picasso >=20 >=20 > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> > To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 02:33:35 > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-GB; > rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100331 Thunderbird/3.0.4 > Subject: Trivial PR, fix shutdown of rc services started with onestart >=20 > This morning I took a look at my outstanding PRs. There > is a PR I consider old and trivial: >=20 > This one proposes a change that always treats rc script execution > of active services as if <service>_enable=3D"YES" was set. > This ensures, among other things, a clean shutdown procedure for > services started with onestart: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dconf/130414 >=20 > Regards >=20 > --=20 > A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-rc@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-rc-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFLxiZlXY6L6fI4GtQRAhEBAJ9TJv4vJH//53Oz83jIlgyqewFI2ACfY7e3 xRlN8gMQiMJVUOX8ZuyxXfc= =o2To -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100414203237.GA5468>