From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 7 09:24:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9892016A4CE for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:24:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (comp.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BB243D2D for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:24:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i779No6E041060; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:23:51 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: (from yar@localhost) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id i779NmjJ041058; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:23:48 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar) Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:23:48 +0400 From: Yar Tikhiy To: Alex Lyashkov Message-ID: <20040807092347.GB39835@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <346a8022040806145018a5e18@mail.gmail.com> <41140139.5080803@savvis.net> <1091862376.7840.3.camel@berloga.shadowland> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1091862376.7840.3.camel@berloga.shadowland> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: cokane@cokane.org Subject: Re: Network interface RUNNING and UP flags X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 09:24:01 -0000 On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 10:06:17AM +0300, Alex Lyashkov wrote: > > not better move this under tp->tap_mtx mutex without using splX > functions? ...especially taking into account that splX do nothing in CURRENT anyway. Mutex locking framework adopted by the interface driver should be used of course. -- Yar