From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 7 09:52:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF69916A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 09:52:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6768C43D46 for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 09:52:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) iA79qVv26299; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 01:52:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Kris Kennaway" , "Rob" Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 01:52:31 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20041106222842.GA69129@xor.obsecurity.org> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal cc: FreeBSD Subject: RE: Is FreeBSD (still) a registered trademark? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 09:52:57 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Kris Kennaway > Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 2:29 PM > To: Rob > Cc: FreeBSD > Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD (still) a registered trademark? > > > On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 08:49:59PM +0900, Rob wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > All I can find is: > > > > FreeBSD is a registered trademark of Wind River Systems, Inc. > > This is expected to change soon. > > > > Has it changed, or is it still? > > Ownership has been transferred to the FreeBSD Foundation in the USA. > I don't know why the webpage hasnt been updated yet. > > Kris > Probably because nobody e-mailed the documentation project. Perhaps one of you might do this - put in the exact url of the page. You can't expect everyone else to fix everything in the documentation if you don't speak up when you see something wrong. Ted