Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 21:54:53 +0400 (MSD) From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> To: Ceri Davies <ceri@freebsd.org> Cc: maho@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/85820: 1.5 times slower performance with SCHED_ULE than SCHED_4BSD Message-ID: <20061008215308.W89071@mp2.macomnet.net> In-Reply-To: <200610081720.k98HKkQx058984@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200610081720.k98HKkQx058984@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, 17:20-0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > Synopsis: 1.5 times slower performance with SCHED_ULE than SCHED_4BSD > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: ceri > State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 8 17:19:36 UTC 2006 > State-Changed-Why: > ULE is no longer the default scheduler, and no longer has a maintainer. > This is an interesting test case though. I think better mark ULE bugs as suspended. I have plans to take them over. -- Maxim Konovalov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061008215308.W89071>