From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 17:31:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FCA016A4D0; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:31:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A550143D5E; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:30:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rrcs-midsouth-24-172-16-118.biz.rr.com [24.172.16.118]) i091UsYr000242; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:30:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) i091Uaxc029240; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:30:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Mark Linimon In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-D+xOayZNkywMZlcDojQQ" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1073611849.799.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 20:30:49 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Edwin Groothuis cc: Hye-Shik Chang cc: python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New mailing list: freebsd-python X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 01:31:00 -0000 --=-D+xOayZNkywMZlcDojQQ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 19:41, Mark Linimon wrote: > > Can we change the owner of a PR to python now just like the java@ > > and gnome@ PRs and lists? >=20 > Recently when the perl@ mailing list was created, there was discussion > about assigning all the perl ports to it. I objected at that time, > saying that there was a canonical name for "unmaintained" and that > was "ports@FreeBSD.org". I think the consensus was that only the > critical (for some definition of critical) PRs would be so assigned. >=20 > My own research shows me that PRs assigned to kde, gnome, emulation, > and phoenix, tend to rot. The java folks are a little more focussed > and thus tend to be better. What? PRs assigned to gnome tend to rot? You may want to have a look at your stats before saying something like that. We have historically been very good at closing PRs in a very reasonable time frame. In fact, we only have one PR opened that assigned to gnome, and this one will most likely be closed shortly. As for PRs assigned to phoenix@, those should be moved over to gnome@. Joe >=20 > mcl >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-D+xOayZNkywMZlcDojQQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA//gRJb2iPiv4Uz4cRAsqHAJwJmRUGuKZTmtqbYH3BFJ4xeuxFPACfTcul zgmk2wERkoox9cxGX3p+7Sw= =2yBB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-D+xOayZNkywMZlcDojQQ--