Date: Sat, 3 Feb 1996 16:09:02 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers) Subject: Re: And the winner is! Message-ID: <199602031509.QAA11280@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199602031322.AAA15664@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Feb 4, 96 00:22:51 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Bruce Evans wrote: > > >If people find it useful (and there are no further objections than the > >single one i've seen by now), i could also move this functionality > >into -stable. > > I still object :-). I knew. :-) (That's the single objection mentioned.) > `auto' only works for dedicated disks, and labelling > those is easy using standard features: Yes, but auto is easier. It has no further ill side-effects except stealing a single string from the virtually unlimited namespace of disktab(5). > The sed command and `auto' do the same fixups for the incomplete label > on /dev/rsdX. What about the chances to make it also work for sliced disks? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602031509.QAA11280>