Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:00:06 +0300
From:      Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>
To:        Pawel Malachowski <pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: PPTP/PPPoE mpd/poptop performance
Message-ID:  <20041109080006.GD41761@cell.sick.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20041028131316.GA73157@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>
References:  <20041026153108.GA91134@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> <20041028113808.GB50262@cell.sick.ru> <20041028131316.GA73157@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 03:13:16PM +0200, Pawel Malachowski wrote:
P> > I'd suggest to choose PPPoE, not PPTP, because the latter is quite
P> > complicated and violated by some client implementation. You will
P> > not find any problems with PPPoE, since ng_pppoe is compatible with
P> > all known PPPoE implementations.
P> 
P> This is what I am currently looking at. I am considering PPTP only because
P> client is already available in Windows machines for free. While in XP PPPoE
P> is already in, I don't see free PPPoE clients for Win9x.
P> I am a bit worried about behaviour in lossy WiFi environments; I'll give it
P> a try in free time, I guess.

Sorry for late reply.
We recommend to use RASPPPoE for winboxes. It is stable and nice software.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041109080006.GD41761>