From owner-freebsd-chat  Fri Feb 28 19:59:47 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA07407
          for chat-outgoing; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 19:59:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpha.risc.org (taob@trt-on1-06.netcom.ca [207.181.81.70])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA07402
          for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 19:59:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (taob@localhost)
          by alpha.risc.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id WAA08046; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 22:59:05 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 22:59:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Brian Tao <taob@risc.org>
To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
cc: FREEBSD-CHAT-L <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: RSA 56-bit key challenge 
In-Reply-To: <199703010123.RAA12036@rah.star-gate.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970228225716.7982C-100000@alpha.risc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 28 Feb 1997, Amancio Hasty wrote:
>
> {hasty} ./rc5-client-freebsd -m
> rc5-56-client: Performance testing with 1000000 crypts
> rc5-56-client: Complete in 3.347 seconds. (298812.07 keys/sec)
> 
> The result looks to fast for me 8)
> 
> So the next question am I am running the reference benchmark correctly?

    That looks right to me.  If you're not affiliated with any team
yet, wanna join ours?  :)  We're rsacrack@vex.net... a late start, but
we're moving up pretty quickly.  :)
--
Brian Tao (BT300, taob@risc.org)
"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"