From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 20 15:51:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16EC916A420; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:51:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gouders@et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de) Received: from alice.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (alice.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de [193.175.197.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A0143D53; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:51:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gouders@et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de) Received: from musashi.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (musashi.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de [193.175.197.95]) by alice.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jBKFpImF015816 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Dec 2005 16:51:18 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by musashi.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBKFp9LH070748; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 16:51:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hank@musashi.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de) Message-Id: <200512201551.jBKFp9LH070748@musashi.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de> To: Joel Dahl In-Reply-To: Message from Joel Dahl of "Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:46:53 +0100." <1135090013.664.56.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 16:51:09 +0100 From: Dirk GOUDERS X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Cc: Scott Long , Ceri Davies , hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: My wish list for 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:51:22 -0000 > Yep, I really like this. The current mess is impossible to maintain > (and also impossible to read). Yesterday I tried to update the kernel > configuration chapter to cover 6.0, but I gave up since there are "do > this for 4.X, do that for 5.X, and maybe this too for 6.X" everywhere. Seems as if my imagination was correct ;-) By the way, I tried to search the archive (doc@) for a possible earlier discussion of this subject but have a hard time to find proper words to search for... Dirk