From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Mar  3 10:35:08 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA06391
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 3 Mar 1996 10:35:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from schizo.cdsnet.net (schizo.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.32])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA06384
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 3 Mar 1996 10:35:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from mrcpu@localhost) by schizo.cdsnet.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id HAA04254; Sun, 3 Mar 1996 07:47:02 -0800
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 1996 07:47:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Following config file kills network, why?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960302085436.442A-100000@terra>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960303074317.8103W-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


Thanks to all those who pointed out that the default rule for IPFW had 
changed to deny rather than accept.  Like most of these problem, in 
retrospect, it should've been obvious...

I will admit that I liked the old way of being able to set the policy, 
rather than have it set for me, but I can re-write my rules.