Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Nov 2017 23:03:46 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 224008] UBLDR doesn't save registers correctly in start.S
Message-ID:  <bug-224008-7@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D224008

            Bug ID: 224008
           Summary: UBLDR doesn't save registers correctly in start.S
           Product: Base System
           Version: 11.1-RELEASE
          Hardware: arm
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Some People
          Priority: ---
         Component: arm
          Assignee: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: parakleta@darkreality.org

Created attachment 188440
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D188440&action=
=3Dedit
Save and Restore U-Boot registers.

Using `ubldr.bin` I was getting intermittent behaviour depending on which
options I compiled into U-Boot.  Eventually I discovered that the issue is =
that
the entry point in `sys/boot/arm/uboot/start.S` is not correctly saving and
restoring registers.  Most importantly the r9 register is the base of the
global data and this is not typically a callee-saved register, but must be =
for
U-Boot.

There is a change to this file on April 2 by "ian" which saves the argument=
 and
return address but it doesn't go far enough.  My patch is to applied to the
state before that patch.

Essentially the important caller-saved registers are pushed (r0, r1, r9, lr)
before the relocation call, and popped after.  Then r8/r9 are saved as usual
for the syscall trampoline, and lr is stored in r8 (now free) as a callee-s=
aved
value before calling into `main`.

The call to `main` can no longer be a tail call because we must restore r9
especially after main returns (although since we have used r8 to hold lr we
must also restore this).

I don't know how this affects the ELF version, but this patch is critical f=
or
the correct functioning of the binary version of UBLDR.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-224008-7>