Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:13:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Kurt Buff <kurt.buff@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206161810130.41364@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <CADy1Ce7MihpmMowc265%2BS_RKorMO3KEKsCgr=pdnjg2jzq-dYQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CADy1Ce7MihpmMowc265%2BS_RKorMO3KEKsCgr=pdnjg2jzq-dYQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> UEFI considerations drive Fedora to pay MSFT to sign their kernel binaries > http://cwonline.computerworld.com/t/8035515/1292406/565573/0/ > > This would seem to make compiling from source difficult. simply do not support it. As long as they are users of Fedora (as well as FreeBSD and other FREE software) there will be hardware available. Possibly the right time for non-wintel hardware to emerge. it isn't already better and cheaper only because of economy of scale - PCs are still produced by millions. But less and less, PC market is already falling.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206161810130.41364>