From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 11:28:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B35DB235 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:28:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wasikowski.net (mail.wasikowski.net [IPv6:2001:6a0:1cb::b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6358B1293 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:28:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wasikowski.net (mail.wasikowski.net [IPv6:2001:6a0:1cb::b]) by mail.wasikowski.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025A940; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:28:00 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at wasikowski.net Received: from mail.wasikowski.net ([91.204.91.44]) by mail.wasikowski.net (scan.wasikowski.net [91.204.91.44]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id t-4IKo7c6r9b; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:27:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.138.150] (83-144-115-210.static.chello.pl [83.144.115.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wasikowski.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BF45FFE; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:27:59 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wasikowski.net; s=default; t=1390908479; bh=clWBk3Z4WfpN30oqQPNvImCR48y9yyVCKeHUQXowWqY=; h=Date:From:To:References:In-Reply-To; b=p575PfZXGLG2hXG+CG2NcA0Tv1+an9IkIZtty0G1p4JzXHZRpeRlkGpz8hUbM/hqG 5704MAPkm8JZApkgDS+pmNK7NSqF/pkJObw44qQHnVapzzoVcErycgjzSQQXFzf19w G7N763+wfqT478ZMNJmLQsPPLbu3aBbQ/FoF0QPElEktHHdJVZXmpoqTihmRH+WG6a UfoWQXbZhONC0N5wW2sxFVtEawpOd++9htWUERJ0oCVKLzxonmZXkAX1+MVRS8t/hn QlLw4xX1PW7hqXsxulb06IUyzpnyPhqJrnSJVNTBcPC6TSl3YFtmNCGOHoxGi1dR0g iReQF1BsZgWnA== Message-ID: <52E7943E.2080908@wasikowski.net> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:27:58 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?xYF1a2FzeiBXxIVzaWtvd3NraQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Brancatelli , "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: BHyVe - ESXi comparison References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:28:13 -0000 W dniu 2014-01-28 12:18, Andrea Brancatelli pisze: > We did a very rough comparison betweend BHyVe and VMWare ESXi. Maybe you > want to give it a read and let me know if I did write a bunch of sh!t :-) > > http://andrea.brancatelli.it/2014/01/28/freebsd-10-0-bhyve-vmware-esxi-5-5-comparison/ > > I must say I'm very pleased with BHyVe performances! Very good work!! > > Thanks for your time. You've wrote: BHyVe took 332 seconds VMWare took 313 seconds The difference is about 106.7%. I think that the correct conclusion should state: if we assume VMware's time as a reference than BHyVe was 6.7% slower (not 106.7%). And it should be 6,41% really :) -- best regards, Lukasz Wasikowski