Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:53:31 +0200 From: "Lutz Donnerhacke" <lutz@donnerhacke.de> To: "=?UTF-8?Q?'=C3=96zkan_KIRIK'?=" <ozkan.kirik@gmail.com>, "'Luigi Rizzo'" <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> Cc: <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, "'Andrey V. Elsukov'" <bu7cher@yandex.ru>, "'freebsd-ipfw'" <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org> Subject: AW: dummynet performance Message-ID: <001501d60e87$05345d60$0f9d1820$@donnerhacke.de> In-Reply-To: <CAAcX-AFcZYHN7CCsCOuvtXsD_0ta8eHKFzi_9QQUrSJTBpRO4w@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAAcX-AEamLFbAucFXYJ0k3FePddYC7M-OtQRsTgQ3UWz_z%2BBBA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BhQ2%2BiFTwvug9TrRme%2BCY0J%2B29yyPhwNrqqEf2hHTeXPehgAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAcX-AFcZYHN7CCsCOuvtXsD_0ta8eHKFzi_9QQUrSJTBpRO4w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In my production environment there are many schedulers and pipes & > queues belongs to this scheds. > dummynet uses %90-100 percent of single cpu. (ie. 20 scheds, 30 pipes, > 35 queues total. Each pipe has max 30-100Mbps) If the perfomance issue is urgent, you may give netgraph (ng_car, = ng_pipe) a try.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001501d60e87$05345d60$0f9d1820$>