From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 9 15:53:39 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F762BDE6C; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 15:53:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lutz@donnerhacke.de) Received: from annwfn.iks-jena.de (annwfn.iks-jena.de [IPv6:2001:4bd8::19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48ym0206Ypz3HQk; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 15:53:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lutz@donnerhacke.de) X-SMTP-Sender: IPv6:2001:4bd8:59:1:172:27:107:102 Received: from lyoness (lyoness.intern.iks-service.de [IPv6:2001:4bd8:59:1:172:27:107:102]) by annwfn.iks-jena.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 039FrVE7014556; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:53:32 +0200 From: "Lutz Donnerhacke" To: "=?UTF-8?Q?'=C3=96zkan_KIRIK'?=" , "'Luigi Rizzo'" Cc: , "'Andrey V. Elsukov'" , "'freebsd-ipfw'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: AW: dummynet performance Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:53:31 +0200 Message-ID: <001501d60e87$05345d60$0f9d1820$@donnerhacke.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Content-Language: de Thread-Index: AQHgQLB+JflcKPVCqeLysoA/Iqzj0AIoT9GQAbiA3uOoPYW0gA== X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48ym0206Ypz3HQk X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of lutz@donnerhacke.de has no SPF policy when checking 2001:4bd8::19) smtp.mailfrom=lutz@donnerhacke.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.02 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[donnerhacke.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.91)[0.908,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.00)[country: DE(-0.02)]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.71)[0.713,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[9.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.8.d.b.4.1.0.0.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15725, ipnet:2001:4bd8::/29, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 15:53:39 -0000 > In my production environment there are many schedulers and pipes & > queues belongs to this scheds. > dummynet uses %90-100 percent of single cpu. (ie. 20 scheds, 30 pipes, > 35 queues total. Each pipe has max 30-100Mbps) If the perfomance issue is urgent, you may give netgraph (ng_car, = ng_pipe) a try.