From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 11 01:03:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AFC106564A for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 01:03:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eknath.iyer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1F48FC13 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 01:03:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so519606fxm.13 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:03:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=77hwWAFJEzdHVdZUaxW6Qd3NdVqGarBVb7Mq/wPy19Q=; b=seRkx7irGRI7VRZ/0LOH1FVuYsq2n2tl6Q+P11NRV2IMaNzhndcL3nRSTvK6yPMz55 WRRALIStCTzecaYdIvczYZKFkIdXRw/aYMB5YI8aQm+dL3fbsRtjNtgGFXCVQkcIsMLI LHuboDh8VMIEyMWyoRum6C2Y/KjH88DujBXq4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=rhU2G1DhXDuh9aippNtOW3bJ5IZzL4cf2ryJf7Jxlzuz29dskErNHlhnBChEXkMSXd vXEob2g1apmoZVAy8tEzmHLrW06wSFPaMrXOZEFie7x0clmcWGL2+HLRYPfTkpBuGKqz PQPVAulR81HVlhkY9DfeofGmJokN2/JfSXvwU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.161.203 with SMTP id i11mr353242hbd.116.1286758988525; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.239.155.133 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 21:03:08 -0400 Message-ID: From: Eknath Venkataramani To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Run queue questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 01:03:10 -0000 How would the scheduling overhead and the system performance be affected when the total number of run queues is reduced from 64 to 32? -- Eknath Venkataramani