Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Oct 2004 04:41:13 -0400
From:      Kero-Chan <kerochan2@gmail.com>
To:        Daniel Gustafsson <daniel.gustafsson@space.se>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Extracting FFS from FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <3b793f1a041019014168692bc9@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200410181055.i9IAtK70006738@space.se>
References:  <20041018064004.U32814@bowser.eecs.harvard.edu> <200410181055.i9IAtK70006738@space.se>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:00:45 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson
<daniel.gustafsson@space.se> wrote:
> It=B4s true that it may be overkill to extract FFS for my needs.
>=20
> The functionallity that I am after is:
> 1. Read/Write etc.
> 2. 1 GB Partitions.
> 3. Few reads and writes to disk.
> 4. RAM footprint between 200-800K
> 5. Blockbased (blocksize 4-8K).
> 6. Configurable.
> 7. Free.
> 8. Multi-user (I will integrate the FS with a RTOS)
> 9. Provides a RAM disk than can be modified to fit "any" secondary storag=
e
> used.
>=20
> NOTE: The above configuration is for the optimal FS.
>=20
> Does someone have any tips on file systems that fit this puropse. I have
> made some research but hasn't yet found anything adeuquate.
>=20
> //Daniel

DOS FAT? My favourite embedded OS is using this:
http://www.rtems.com/features.html#filesystems
But it's not "multiuser" in the UNIX sense...

If you're just looking for a simple UNIX FS, the MINIX file system is
quite appropriate. And Linux has a fairly portable GPL implementation.
[Sorry for advertising Linux on the FreeBSD list :]



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3b793f1a041019014168692bc9>