From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 14 16:04:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468EC16A40F for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:04:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE9443D7D for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:04:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F5E388DEE for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:04:26 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:00:41 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <2F21C23C49C1448E2610CD9E@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <62007.209.103.215.99.1158241221.squirrel@email.polands.org> References: <62007.209.103.215.99.1158241221.squirrel@email.polands.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.5 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========BF6AA6DFA1808315373A==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: BSDStats project, interesting returns from OpenBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:04:36 -0000 --==========BF6AA6DFA1808315373A========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On Thursday, September 14, 2006 08:40:21 -0500 Doug Poland=20 wrote: > I just glanced at the latest statistics on www.bsdstats.org. In the > last week or so OpenBSD has "overtaken" FreeBSD in the USA. > > Should one conclude that OpenBSD admins have enthusiastically embraced > this project and FreeBSD admins have not; or, is OpenBSD really more > widely deployed than FreeBSD? > What page are you looking at? www.bsdstats.org shows 2868 FreeBSD machines = and 1379 OpenBSD machines. Only in the US is OpenBSD "ahead" of FreeBSD.=20 So I suppose you could say that OpenBSD admins *within* the US have=20 embraced the project more willingly than FreeBSD admins or OpenBSD is more=20 widely used *within* the US. But I doubt any of this is meaningful. It=20 won't be until we get a great deal more systems reporting. 5097 systems=20 worldwide must be less than 1% of the total systems in use worldwide, I=20 would think. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========BF6AA6DFA1808315373A==========--