From owner-freebsd-current Mon Oct 7 21:31:54 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA05340 for current-outgoing; Mon, 7 Oct 1996 21:31:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA05324 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 1996 21:31:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA01285; Mon, 7 Oct 1996 22:30:59 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 1996 22:30:59 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199610080430.WAA01285@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams To: Dan Janowski Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best mail for threaded majordomo reading? In-Reply-To: <3259C7E9.41C67EA6@netcom.com> References: <3259C7E9.41C67EA6@netcom.com> Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > What are you guys using? I am using netscape > mail which does threading and mbox-es nicely, but > it has some annoying deficiencies. I use XEmacs + VM, which works very well for me. > What is a > good way of auto-processing all the mail into > separate mbox-es, i.e. put list mail somewhere > different than "regular" mail? The port of procmail works great. Both VM and procmail work together well, although you need to make sure you dump your email into the spool folder and *NOT* the read folders. Nate