From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 25 12:54:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7803437B71A for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 12:54:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2PKqJl01544; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 12:52:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200103252052.f2PKqJl01544@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Anish A Patankar Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MALLOC In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 25 Mar 2001 15:02:28 EST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 12:52:19 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Hi, > MALLOC and FREE at the kernel level, what arguments does it take? > the man page does not seem to help much/ MALLOC and FREE are obsolete. Use malloc and free instead. However, I'm not sure what you mean by "the manpage does not seem to help much"; your comment doesn't seem to help much either. 8) A more specific description of your problem might yield a better answer. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message