Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:48:12 -0800
From:      Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org>
To:        Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, freebsd-testing <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Revisiting the ZFS test suite
Message-ID:  <CAPrugNob8XGrsX36g96o%2B4va1H%2B%2Bhz649J7OFLu1d-DZh8ASeA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOtMX2hFQnnfqKSyzo7LDdmLoc==_wrxFB6fASuxgN=d=Tjk%2BA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAOtMX2hFQnnfqKSyzo7LDdmLoc==_wrxFB6fASuxgN=d=Tjk%2BA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
FYI the ZTS TRIM test suite can=E2=80=99t be run on FreeBSD at the moment d=
ue to
the absence of a hole punching API.

https://freebsd-arch.freebsd.narkive.com/JKZnzc4p/hole-punching-trim-etc

https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/projects/25


On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 09:24 Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> wrote:

> My employment status changed last week, and I find myself once again
> working on ZFS.  It's hard to have confidence in any changes without a
> solid test suite, so my main task right now is to fix the problems in
> FreeBSD's ZFS test suite.  Our most recent run had 64 failed tests and 99
> skipped ones; let's get those down to 0 and something small, respectively=
.
>
> https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test_zfs/3880/testReport/
>
> Would anybody be interested to review my changes to the test suite?  It's
> not terrible if I have to commit without review; I can't possibly break
> anything but the test suite itself.
>
> -Alan
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPrugNob8XGrsX36g96o%2B4va1H%2B%2Bhz649J7OFLu1d-DZh8ASeA>