Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 18:13:06 +0200 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ OT ] recommendations for a domain_name registrar Message-ID: <20150721181306.2eac67eb.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <3826.128.135.70.188.1437491846.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> References: <55ADC5CE.5050207@risebroadband.net> <55ADCF06.20500@FreeBSD.org> <3826.128.135.70.188.1437491846.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:17:26 -0500 (CDT), Valeri Galtsev wrote: > That said: the diagnostics on the side of gandi.net is > bogus (you can not extract any information from that). Attempt to send > e-mail to postmaster@[hosted at gandi domain] to clear the matters is not > accepted, which is a violation of RFC (what is relevant RFC number?). Are you refering to RFC 2142? "However, if a given service is offerred, then the associated mailbox name(es) must be supported, resulting in delivery to a recipient appropriate for the referenced service or role." For a provider of e-mail and DNS, the following should apply: MAILBOX SERVICE SPECIFICATIONS ----------- ---------------- --------------------------- POSTMASTER SMTP [RFC821], [RFC822] HOSTMASTER DNS [RFC1033-RFC1035] I think this is what you should be able to expect from a company that offers a non-trivial service as mentioned above... Source: https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2142.txt -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150721181306.2eac67eb.freebsd>