From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 11 16:19:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44607106564A for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:19:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10A38FC25 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d27so1677053tid.3 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:19:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=7Y0NK5zpt9fw1Km2j1qakEZ5OdgxJ5LUYZyDdRkEb/A=; b=pevcUGt6jQg/nMmcEpB+MPCPnTMWBvslXsrapj1KZEvtnRjf3XreogPBPfqcZo81YV fhaBNLlI17JdGO/CqVqE4PAOIXd6dAyaZOdSW31b9wJ+tPrrkfT/1HankBNTsq7Pisus OvRxeAR1LV4TvESvuIVxo6LAZ0PknnM8hmjE0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=jvR6B1fv+el8u/FCu9YNz8WdKZLL6nrHU0Dtc9ynMcJPrWekRkW4rn6NHpizOGRWgN GkFYaXF/5clx3Pq8vjMC4i8pKpFBTcYDeRYhluAXRSjWeNu7MZ7H9Q3M6jTVDO2MWH04 iobWENpHCuRAT0vM69OBspq09RgfSAjyX4YCk= Received: by 10.110.28.15 with SMTP id b15mr6180301tib.26.1215793141128; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.110.86.17 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:19:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5635aa0d0807110919j3f8df5e5kc23e8787b5a4e28b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:19:00 +0700 From: "Outback Dingo" To: "David Alanis" In-Reply-To: <20080711104745.q4h3cuoewcgcgw4o@mail.dalan.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <990695FC90DB4BC8B3439F779B73FCF8@msdi.local> <20080711132343.GH90678@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20080712000851.3d259b2a@ayiin> <5635aa0d0807110832p1e5e8f23p32ae7cbee9b2479a@mail.gmail.com> <20080711104745.q4h3cuoewcgcgw4o@mail.dalan.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Norberto Meijome , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux for freebsd admins X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:19:03 -0000 I also find ot quite funny nobody asked about the heart of the matter before spewing outlinux derivitives its not a complex equation here, problem, app wount run... solution change OS ?? doesnt strike me as a good path for resolving the original issue problem, app wount run solution what the app first of all, second now find out what it requires. On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:47 PM, David Alanis wrote: > Quoting Outback Dingo : > > Simple question whats the application, and what does it state for >> requirements, by the way anything RPM based or Gentoo completely suck and >> are royal pains in the ASS >> > > Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! > > Redhat sucks, you have to pay them monies, it's dependancy hell, AND you > have to do things their way - otherwise your system will be shizz. Yeah, > what are your goals for this system? > > On the other hand, Gentoo is very clean and the next best thing to FreeBSD. > If you look up their history, Gentoo is a Linux deritive of freeBSD it has > many things in common if you ask me (thanks to Gentoo I am now on freeBSD). > > so... i wonder why this app wouldnt run on Ubuntu Server or Debian for >> that >> matter, whats the application, because Debian is by far the easiest and >> most >> sensible from a mmanageability aspect >> > > Why do you want to dumb down? I don't want to talk down any Linux system > (EXCEPT RED HAT) but Gentoo is more stable, and the footprint is quite > small, more manageable, and they don't put out release after release. Gentoo > is more of a server system but makes a great desktop as well. > > > >> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Norberto Meijome >> wrote: >> >> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:23:43 +0200 >>> Albert Shih wrote: >>> >>> > Fedora/CentOS : Using yum and rpm. Work well but they are not >>> many >>> > packages in the official repository. You need to find with >>> rpmfind >>> > many package. >>> >>> you may want to use dag's repository, as well as the cutting edge >>> official >>> centos repository (CentosPlus, i think). >>> >>> http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/FAQ.php >>> >>> B >>> _________________________ >>> {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome >>> >>> If it's there, and you can see it, it's real. >>> If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual. >>> If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent. >>> If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it. >>> >>> I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when >>> wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You >>> have >>> been Warned. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > >