From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 17 15:34:24 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7842316A4CE
	for <freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 15:34:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from arthur.nitro.dk (port324.ds1-khk.adsl.cybercity.dk
	[212.242.113.79])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB18743D46
	for <freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 15:34:22 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from simon@arthur.nitro.dk)
Received: by arthur.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 3000)
	id 825231184C; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 00:34:21 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 00:34:21 +0100
From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
To: Josh Paetzel <friar_josh@tcbug.org>
Message-ID: <20031217233414.GA658@arthur.nitro.dk>
References: <20031217141537.GB6618@ns1.tcbug.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031217141537.GB6618@ns1.tcbug.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: docproj port
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 23:34:24 -0000


--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2003.12.17 14:15:38 +0000, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> I noticed that there is now a couple of new docproj ports, one with jadet=
ex=20
> and one without...I'm wondering if the fdp should be updated to reflect t=
he=20
> new ports, as the old docproj port appears to be depreciated, or at the v=
ery=20
> least no longer needed.

The two "new" ports docproj-jadetex and docproj-nojadetex are just
metaports that set the JADETEX make variable to either "yes" or "no" and
then include the docproj port.  The docproj port is not depreciated, two
to meta ports are just there to make it simpler to install the docproj
port.

If you think the FDP should tell people about the two "new" ports you
chould submit a patch :-).

--=20
Simon L. Nielsen
FreeBSD Documentation Team

--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/4Of2h9pcDSc1mlERAiIzAJ97ggKWdonGaDCGV53ASb2hUuX+PwCfSwi5
WeNJytE9JZupYLjlaPex8Oc=
=Qpk1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--