Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 15 Jan 2012 00:03:02 +0200
From:      =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= <kes-kes@yandex.ru>
To:        =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= <kes-kes@yandex.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, bz@FreeBSD.org, rwatson@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re[2]: misc/164130: broken netisr initialization
Message-ID:  <1241404550.20120115000302@yandex.ru>
In-Reply-To: <68477246.20120115000025@yandex.ru>
References:  <201201142126.q0ELQVbZ087496@freefall.freebsd.org> <68477246.20120115000025@yandex.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Çäðàâñòâóéòå, Êîíüêîâ.

Âû ïèñàëè 15 ÿíâàðÿ 2012 ã., 0:00:25:

ÊÅ> also in r222249 next things are broken:

ÊÅ> 1. in net.isr.dispatch = deferred

ÊÅ> intr{swiX: netisr X} always have state 'WAIT'

ÊÅ>   PID USERNAME   PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE   C   TIME   WCPU COMMAND
ÊÅ>    11 root       155 ki31     0K    32K RUN     1  25:02 87.16% idle{idle: cpu1}
ÊÅ>    11 root       155 ki31     0K    32K CPU0    0  25:08 86.72% idle{idle: cpu0}
ÊÅ>    11 root       155 ki31     0K    32K CPU2    2  24:23 83.50% idle{idle: cpu2}
ÊÅ>    11 root       155 ki31     0K    32K CPU3    3  24:47 81.93% idle{idle: cpu3}
ÊÅ>    12 root       -92    -     0K   248K WAIT    3   0:59  6.54% intr{irq266: re0}
ÊÅ>  3375 root        40    0 15468K  6504K select  2   1:03  4.98% snmpd
ÊÅ>    12 root       -72    -     0K   248K WAIT    3   0:28  3.12% intr{swi1: netisr 1}
ÊÅ>    12 root       -60    -     0K   248K WAIT    0   0:34  1.71% intr{swi4: clock}
ÊÅ>    12 root       -72    -     0K   248K WAIT    3   0:27  1.71% intr{swi1: netisr 3}
ÊÅ>    12 root       -72    -     0K   248K WAIT    1   0:20  1.37% intr{swi1: netisr 0}
ÊÅ>     0 root       -92    0     0K   152K -       2   0:30  0.98% kernel{dummynet}
ÊÅ>    12 root       -72    -     0K   248K WAIT    3   0:13  0.88% intr{swi1: netisr 2}
ÊÅ>    13 root       -92    -     0K    32K sleep   1   0:11  0.24% ng_queue{ng_queue3}
ÊÅ>    13 root       -92    -     0K    32K sleep   1   0:11  0.10% ng_queue{ng_queue0}
ÊÅ>    13 root       -92    -     0K    32K sleep   1   0:11  0.10% ng_queue{ng_queue1}


ÊÅ> 2. There is no cpu load differences between dispatch methods. I have
ÊÅ> tested two: direct and deferred (see on picture)

ÊÅ> http://piccy.info/view3/2482121/cc6464fbe959fd65ecb5a8b94a23ec38/orig/

ÊÅ> 'deferred' method works same as 'direct' method!

sorry, do not clear:

17:00 -- 21:00 -- direct

23:30 -- END   -- deferred

-- 
Ñ óâàæåíèåì,
 Êîíüêîâ                          mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1241404550.20120115000302>