From owner-freebsd-arch  Mon Jul 10  4:22:31 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.2.163])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 486FE37B527; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 04:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za)
	by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.15 #1)
	id 13Bbdg-0000Cm-00; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 13:22:16 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: papowell@astart.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? - License Issues 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Jul 2000 03:51:27 MST."
             <20000710035127.B92445@dragon.nuxi.com> 
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 13:22:16 +0200
Message-ID: <791.963228136@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Mon, 10 Jul 2000 03:51:27 MST, "David O'Brien" wrote:

> Not an issue.
> If LPRng were imported into src/contib/, there would be BSD make
> Makefiles that we create in /usr/src/usr.bin/.....

Do you have ideas on how to handle the optional features of the package,
such as mysql support?  The author listed a few features which would
rely on packages in the ports tree.  This was the reason I felt that
LPRng is better suited to being provided as a port.

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message