From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Nov 23 18:23:53 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA24180 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 18:23:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from iconoclastic.com (dyna160.dialup.dti.net [206.252.158.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA24170 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 18:23:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from spork@dti.net) Received: from localhost (spork@localhost) by iconoclastic.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA04030 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 21:22:27 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: iconoclastic.com: spork owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 21:22:25 +0000 (GMT) From: sporkl X-Sender: spork@iconoclastic.com Reply-To: sporkl@dti.net To: freebsd questions Subject: Upclocking Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hello. I have heard mention pf "upclocking" a chip to a higher speed. Is this what it seems to be, trying to trun a foo speed chip att foo+bar MHZ? How is this accomplished, via hardware or software? What are the drawbacks or side effects? thank you. -Spike Gronim sporkl@dti.net "Tradition is the chastity belt of the mind"