Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:15:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: "Thomas D. Dean" <tomdean@speakeasy.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Clang Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206161814000.41364@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org> References: <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Has the discussion on why change to clang been made available? > > I would like to know the reasoning. CLANG isn't GNU licenced. Getting rid of communist licence is right, but still it should not be the prime reason for doing things, as having GNU licenced gcc doesn't really hurt. personally i don't see CLANG anyhow better for now. AFAIK it is even more bloated than gcc > Or, is it simply a gratuitous change? > > Tom Dean > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206161814000.41364>