From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 10 12:56:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78DA1988 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:56:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (feld.me [66.170.3.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A4CCC5 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:56:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=F+dKGL6RnLbPGfz/bgxFcdvKvVGeIaVsQPqEWWPl96g=; b=Hn2fkFXGr1PlLhhusgBMFFg8oKjdI79AKsTFTBoWrrciMqY75YE6mXjYcts9ofKn6+0Ko4INRP7XD1GXLJWCPuEMjQ7X9r6XCUxni+TgUEuoVhVgP56D+5DSA3giHf//; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TtHg9-000E0B-3Q; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 06:56:17 -0600 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpsa id 1357822571-49025-49023/5/1; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:56:11 +0000 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 06:56:11 -0600 From: Mark Felder To: moto kawasaki Subject: Re: 9.1R? Message-Id: <20130110065611.03e66265@tech304.office.supranet.net> In-Reply-To: <20121223.183654.1876624675013089283.moto@kawasaki3.org> References: <000301cddfa8$b6af8b70$240ea250$@ezwind.net> <20121222012933.5694d482@tech304> <20121223.183654.1876624675013089283.moto@kawasaki3.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5 X-SA-Score: -1.5 Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:56:20 -0000 On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:36:54 +0900 moto kawasaki wrote: > It might be better to disable rxcsum, txcsum, and lro, too. > My understanding is the point is the 'NIC hardware' is not the real > one but emulation by Xen Host, so that those 'off loading' makes > context switch storm between domU and dom0. > # please kindly correct me if wrong. You're actually quite correct as this is a source of network problems on = many different domU OSes.