Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Dec 2001 19:44:40 -0600
From:      Steve Price <steve@havk.org>
To:        Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk>
Cc:        Ying-Chieh Liao <ijliao@freebsd.org>, "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@freebsd.org.ru>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org, cvs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ports/32533: new port: databases/db4 (DB v4)
Message-ID:  <20011220194440.Q72144@bsd.havk.org>
In-Reply-To: <20011221013744.A13810@tao.org.uk>; from joe@tao.org.uk on Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 01:37:44AM %2B0000
References:  <200112131320.fBDDKMX60644@freefall.freebsd.org> <20011213134905.GA4168@terry.dragon2.net> <20011219145101.C5338@tao.org.uk> <20011219201430.GA75055@terry.dragon2.net> <20011221012544.A13613@tao.org.uk> <20011220193432.P72144@bsd.havk.org> <20011221013744.A13810@tao.org.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 01:37:44AM +0000, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> 
> This is official ports policy?  Maybe it's better for portsmgr to ask

It used to be official ports policy that you'd ask Satoshi for
a repo-copy.  Since he is the Ports Wraith he got the chance to
approve it before it happened.  Now with portmgr I think it is a
reasonable thing to ask them since they've been tasked with
helping Satoshi with some of the ports-related stuff.

> for ports repo-copies then, otherwise how do we know that they've
> got approval?

I was just about to bring this up with portmgr (note without the
extra 's').  We have touched on this topic before but nothing
official became of it.

-steve

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011220194440.Q72144>