From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 00:37:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A678C16A41F; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:37:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8062113C487; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:37:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5J0blM2036465; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:37:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) with ESMTP id l5J0bksu036462; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:37:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:37:46 -0700 (PDT) From: mjacob@freebsd.org To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20070618233858.GA79358@rot13.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20070618173721.K36450@ns1.feral.com> References: <4676BAF0.4030703@gmail.com> <20070618180813.GA13003@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <322073cc0706181415o17ecd532i971d8bdf5ea1dafd@mail.gmail.com> <20070618221022.GA17952@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <20070618233858.GA79358@rot13.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Jeremy Chadwick , Martin Turgeon , freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386 with PAE or AMD64 on PowerEdge with 4G RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mjacob@freebsd.org List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:37:55 -0000 On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:10:22PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 05:15:30PM -0400, Martin Turgeon wrote: >>> My setup is fairly standard (as I described), should I expect problem with >>> 64 bit version of these programs? >> >> Like I said, I don't run 64-bit OSes because I prefer compatibility. >> Believe me, the instant you run into some quirky problem with either the >> kernel or any of its subsystems, or a third-party program (from ports or >> otherwise), the first thing you'll be told is "it works for me on i386, >> have you tried i386?" > > I think this assertion is false. amd64 is pretty well supported and > run by an increasing number of users and developers. Not only that, but I missed an important bug in i386 because I generally run nothing *but* amd64/Xeon by now.