From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 15:00:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDDC16A41F; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:00:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from pinus.cc.fer.hr (pinus.cc.fer.hr [161.53.73.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD72643D62; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:00:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from [161.53.72.113] (lara.cc.fer.hr [161.53.72.113]) by pinus.cc.fer.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id jBJF0iFx020790; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:00:44 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <43A6CACE.30902@fer.hr> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:59:26 +0100 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050921) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Andree References: <20051213151908.GA26821@crodrigues.org> <20051216132641.C29205@electra.nolink.net> <20051217141528.GB27992@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <20051217141528.GB27992@merlin.emma.line.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFS (read-only) support committed to CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:00:57 -0000 Matthias Andree wrote: > I was wondering if the way from ext2fs to ext3fs might have been > shorter, code-wise. For what it's worth, IIRC in Linux the code for ext3fs is separated from ext2fs - it's not handled by a bunch of #ifdefs but a separate (and much larger - IIRC at least 2x the code) codebase. From this I think that adding ext3 functionality to FreeBSD will also be similar - like a port of a completely different filesystem from scratch.