Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 22:31:55 -0800 From: "Tim O'Neil" <toniel@flash.net> To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Ethernet Help Req. Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19980226223155.00ac1bd0@pop.flash.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980226215237.18046A-100000@uniqsite.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I'm just plinking along trying to teach myself setting up a lan in my house, going for a peer to peer 10 base 2 set up between a 2.2.1 and a win nt box. Setting up the fbsd box was not a real chore, I've been able to work through all the issues thus far without too much a hassle, and I've learned alot. But I'm stumped on starting named. I'm running the named that comes with 2.2.1. When I attempt a named -b /etc/namedb/named.boot I get back "syntax error near <first line>". General experience with my mistakes leads me to believe that the named.boot file has nothing to do with it, but I will reproduce a few lines here for fun: cache . named.root primary . localhost primary 127.in-... IP127 And so on. Netstat -r returns (snipped): (the phys interface is an NE2000, so the device is ed0) <D> <G> <F> <R> <U> <N> default fbsdbox UGSc 1 6 ed0 10/24 link#1 UC 0 0 10/24 <addr> UHLW 2 1601 lo0 <loopback interface blah blah...> I hope I've been brief without omitting too much. My main questions would be: is this network architecture viable? What might I be missing with named? I ktraced named but all it told me was that it didn't like named.boot. (Back to square one). Like I said I'm self-teaching me all this network stuff, so this is not mission critiical (thank ghod), but I want to learn. Thanks. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.3.32.19980226223155.00ac1bd0>