From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 29 12:43:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail.webmonster.de (datasink.webmonster.de [194.162.162.209]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F356637B42C for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 12:43:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from karsten@rohrbach.de) Received: (qmail 94883 invoked by uid 1000); 29 May 2001 19:44:03 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 21:44:03 +0200 From: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: interesting os comparison charts Message-ID: <20010529214403.L85298@mail.webmonster.de> Mail-Followup-To: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Arbitrary-Number-Of-The-Day: 42 X-URL: http://www.webmonster.de/ X-Disclaimer: My opinions do not necessarily represent those of my employer Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG there is a nice comparison of *bsd/linux/solaris systems under load in terms of http/nfs netio and fs performance on the net: http://innominate.org/%7Etgr/slides/performance/tuning.htm the author also addresses the typical GENERIC kernel problems on production machines (NBMCLUSTERS too low,...), anyway it's very interesting to read. he also addresses the typical linux problems on production boxes. have fun, /k -- KR433/KR11-RIPE -- WebMonster Community Founder -- nGENn GmbH Senior Techie http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.net/ karsten&rohrbach.de -- alpha&ngenn.net -- alpha&scene.org -- catch@spam.de GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message