From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Apr 26 21: 5:22 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from starbug.ugh.net.au (starbug.ugh.net.au [203.31.238.37])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E0E37BE8A
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 21:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from andrew@ugh.net.au)
Received: by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 77F8EA837; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 14:05:37 +1000 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 70751540E; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 14:05:37 +1000 (EST)
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 14:05:37 +1000 (EST)
From: andrew@ugh.net.au
To: Shawn Barnhart <swb@grasslake.net>
Cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: tcpd in 4.0-stable
In-Reply-To: <022801bfaf85$abee8530$b8209fc0@marlowe>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004271402400.83786-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au>
X-WonK: *wibble*
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Shawn Barnhart wrote:

> On a side note, if tcpd is in 4.0's base system, what included services are
> linked against libwrap?  portmap?  nfs?  sendmail?  It would nice if
> everything with that option was buildable with that option.

You can find out by running:

ldd `which <prog>`

inetd and portmap both are.

BTW this only works for dynamically linked executables...it appears nfsd
is static.

Andrew



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message