From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Apr 10 13:20:51 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA27507 for isp-outgoing; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 13:20:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yacko.netgazer.net (yacko.netgazer.net [208.12.177.63]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA27485 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 13:20:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [208.12.177.224] (furball.netgazer.com [208.12.177.224]) by yacko.netgazer.net (8.8.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA24728 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 15:25:04 GMT Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <199704101707.KAA26278@main.netcorps.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 15:23:00 -0500 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: "Darrin R. Woods" Subject: Re: Sprint or MCI ?? Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >On Thu, 10 Apr 1997, Chris Bura wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We're trying to decide between Sprint or MCI for our T1 service. >> They both have the good sales pitches. >> >> Sprint says they're all IP and MCI mixes frame with IP. >> MCI says they have 40% of the internet traffic. > >I only have experience with uunet, and sprint - and I like sprint. They >give you a full T1, not a stuffed one, and arent down much. They have had >troubles in the past - everybody does. I would have to second this opinion. We also switched from UUNet to Sprint and have been happy ever since. They have responded very quickly (usually within an hour) to any problems or questions that we have. They get a bad rap from some past mistakes, but they seem to have their act together as we have never experienced any problems with them. Darrin R. Woods | "I'm so happy that I, can't stop crying." Director Operations | Netgazer Solutions, Inc. | work: http://www.netgazer.net Dallas, Texas 972.702.9119 | home: http://www.intosh.com My employer most whole-heartedly denies everything I say