From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 26 16:01:04 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED9D1065670
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:01:04 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com)
Received: from constantine.ticketswitch.com (constantine.ticketswitch.com
	[IPv6:2002:57e0:1d4e:1::3])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 642FD8FC1D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:01:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dilbert.rattatosk ([10.64.50.6] helo=dilbert.ticketswitch.com)
	by constantine.ticketswitch.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <petefrench@ticketswitch.com>)
	id 1PAlxN-000E2G-FX; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:01:01 +0100
Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ticketswitch.com with local (Exim 4.72
	(FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <petefrench@ticketswitch.com>)
	id 1PAlxN-000H5x-Eh; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:01:01 +0100
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:01:01 +0100
Message-Id: <E1PAlxN-000H5x-Eh@dilbert.ticketswitch.com>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, petefrench@ticketswitch.com,
	to.my.trociny@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <E1PAlTI-000Gtb-Lz@dilbert.ticketswitch.com>
From: Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: hast vs ggate+gmirror sychrnoisation speed
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:01:04 -0000

 Actually, I just llooked I dmesg on the secondary - it is full
of messages thus:

Oct 26 15:44:59 serpentine-passive hastd[10394]: [serp0] (secondary) Unable to receive request header: RPC version wrong.
Oct 26 15:45:00 serpentine-passive hastd[782]: [serp0] (secondary) Worker process exited ungracefully (pid=10394, exitcode=75).
Oct 26 15:46:59 serpentine-passive hastd[10421]: [serp0] (secondary) Unable to receive request header: RPC version wrong.
Oct 26 15:47:04 serpentine-passive hastd[782]: [serp0] (secondary) Worker process exited ungracefully (pid=10421, exitcode=75).


Does that help explain my issues ? I have the same OS build running on both
machines, so I dont see how I can have a version mismatch.

The ethernet here cnsists of a pair of bge devices, which are bundled
using LACP and lagg. I didnt see this on my test setup, but that
was using ethernet directly - could there be a difference there ?

-pete.