From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 1 14:58:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E981065672 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 14:58:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from constantine.ticketswitch.com (constantine.ticketswitch.com [IPv6:2002:57e0:1d4e:1::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2017A8FC1D for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 14:58:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from dilbert.rattatosk ([10.64.50.6] helo=dilbert.ticketswitch.com) by constantine.ticketswitch.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ldn77-0005iQ-Gq; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 14:57:57 +0000 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ticketswitch.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ldn77-000AGN-FT; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 14:57:57 +0000 To: dnelson@allantgroup.com In-Reply-To: <20090301031001.GB3465@dan.emsphone.com> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 14:57:57 +0000 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vm_thread_new: kstack allocation failed with vm.kmem_size="1536M" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 14:58:05 -0000 > I'm running 7-STABLE as of Feb 26 or so. Commit r187466 on Jan 20 bumped up > kmem_size_max on amd64 to 3.6GB: > > http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=187466 Mmmmm.... now I am wworried about upgrading to STABLE! ;) I can't think of a reason why I am seeing what I am seeing - on 7.1-RELEASE I am certainly icreasing the limits not decreasing them, yet I am seeing it running out of memory on the larger limit. Note that these machines have no swap - but then since the system runs fine on a 4gig machine with 4 gig of sap, I made the assumption that if the machine was expanded to 8 gig of real memory it no longer needs the swap, as it now has as much real RAM in it as real+swap was before. -pete.